Case study
A small firm: client drafts back in hours, every send still reviewed
A firm of lawyers and assistants where drafts waited in a queue. Now a lawyer can have a draft reply ready to review within hours, and nothing goes out without a person pressing send.
- 2 hoursfrom a client's email to a draft reply ready for the lawyer
- About 3back-burner pieces of work one lawyer cleared in the first week
- 9 of 9practice-software actions tested before the team relied on them
The job
The firm barely used AI. A lawyer might paste something into a chat window now and then, but the daily work ran the way it always had. Assistants keyed client and matter details by hand. A lawyer's notes went into an assistant's queue, and the draft came back when the queue allowed.
Nobody was doing anything wrong. The work was simply bigger than the hours.
What I built
- AI for the lawyers and staff on the firm's business plan, set up in person at each desk.
- Access to the firm's own precedents, so drafts start from the firm's own work rather than a blank page.
- Shared instructions for the firm's most common documents and tasks, so everyone gets the same quality of draft.
- Email drafting inside the email the firm already uses, plus dictation (you talk, it types).
- A connector to the firm's practice software that can find files, create records, add notes and log time. I tested every action before the team relied on it.
- A log of every change the AI makes, and drafts by default.
I worked alongside the firm's own IT provider, who handled the network side.
What changed
- A client emailed a lawyer with a question. A draft reply was ready for the lawyer to review within two hours of her email.
- In his first week, one lawyer cleared about three pieces of work that had been sitting on the back burner. His first case summary came back in about 15 minutes.
- One assistant used it to read and summarize dozens of client emails on a file. When she tested it with the wrong file number, it caught the mismatch and asked if she meant the other file.
What stayed in human hands
Nothing goes out without a person reviewing it and pressing send. That includes documents sent for signature. I tested it: when the AI tried to send an email, it stopped and waited for a person, and the send was refused.
Honest limits
The practice-software connector cannot edit or delete records, and it cannot read documents stored there. Building a larger package of documents is still the slow part of the day. Every connector has limits like these, and the team knows them.
Start with a conversation
Tell Devan about the repeat work that takes the most time in your practice. If AI is a good fit, he will say so. If it is not, he will say that too.
Prefer email? [email protected]